COMPARISON HUB

BrandCrux vs. every AI search visibility tool

Side-by-side breakdowns vs Profound, Otterly, Peec, Rankscale, and Scrunch — pricing, engines, sampling quality, and the honest call on when to pick someone else.

1,000 credits on signup. All API engines. No credit card.
Head-to-head snapshots

The honest take on each one

One card per competitor: pricing band, the multiplier on coverage at the equivalent BrandCrux tier, and where they actually win.

BrandCrux vs
Profound

Enterprise-grade AI visibility platform used by ~10% of the Fortune 500. Raised $96M Series C at a $1B valuation in February 2026.

~240× more rows, 6× more engines, sampled with confidence intervals, at the same headline price
They win at: Prompt Volumes — proprietary consumer panel data showing actual AI query volumes with demographic breakdowns. No competitor offers this at scale.
BrandCrux vs
Otterly.AI

Affordable AI search visibility platform with strong GEO audit capabilities. Gartner Cool Vendor 2025, G2 High Performer.

~7× more sampled rows, every measurement carries a confidence interval, white-label reports + 25 businesses at near-identical price
They win at: GEO URL audits at scale included on Standard+ (1,000-10,000 audits/mo).
BrandCrux vs
Peec AI

Budget-friendly AI visibility monitoring with strong multi-country support and unlimited team seats on every plan.

Near price parity. Peec gives ~2.5× raw volume; BrandCrux includes REST API + AI Assistant at $99 and every measurement carries a confidence interval.
They win at: Citation Gap Analysis — shows which trusted sources cite competitors but not you. Genuinely useful and unique.
BrandCrux vs
Rankscale

Affordable credit-based AI visibility tracker with the broadest engine coverage at every tier and full-fidelity AI response snapshots.

Same price, same API access. Rankscale gives ~4× raw rows; BrandCrux rows each carry a confidence interval, plus the AI Assistant is included.
They win at: Broadest engine coverage at every tier (8+ engines including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, DeepSeek, Mistral, Claude, Grok, Copilot all included).
BrandCrux vs
Scrunch AI

Enterprise AEO/GEO platform with the unique Agent Experience Platform (AXP) that delivers AI-optimized content variants at the CDN layer.

~12× more sampled rows, MCP + content engine + CMS publishing included, at near-identical price (~20% premium)
They win at: Agent Experience Platform (AXP) — serves AI-optimized content to AI agents at the CDN layer without affecting human visitors. Genuinely unique.
All five at a glance

The matrix

FeatureBrandCruxProfoundOtterlyPeecRankscaleScrunch
Starting priceFree / $99$499$29~$93$20$250
Free tier1,000 credits
Self-serve signup✓ all tiersSalesSales
AI engines (base)16+1-10438+4
Sampling + CI✓ Wilson 95%
Public REST API✓ at $99EnterpriseCustom$780/moEnterprise
MCP server✓ at $299Enterprise
Content engine✓ at $299EnterpriseEnterprise
GEO audit
White-label reports✓ at $499EnterpriseAgencyAgency
SSO / SAMLEnterprise✓ Enterprise✓ Enterprise
Unique to themPrompt VolumesGEO bulkCitation GapMost enginesAXP (CDN)

All competitor pricing and features verified May 2026 against vendor public pricing pages.

Quick decision tree

Which one do you actually need?

Do you need consumer panel data on what real users are asking AI engines about your category?
Profound — they're the only one with Prompt Volumes. Be ready for $499+/mo and a sales call.
Do you need CDN-layer content delivery to AI agents (serving optimized variants without affecting human visitors)?
Scrunch — their Agent Experience Platform is unique. Enterprise pricing.
Do you only need to track 15 prompts ever and want a Looker Studio connector?
Otterly Lite at $29/mo could fit.
Do you want statistical confidence on every measurement, transparent self-serve pricing, REST API at Starter ($99) and MCP at Growth ($299), all engines included, content generation alongside tracking, and a free tier to evaluate?
BrandCrux. Start free →
The quality wedge

We're the only ones who sample 5-10 times

Every other tool runs each prompt once and gives you a number. We run each prompt 5-10 times and give you the number plus a confidence interval. When the same prompt against the same model returns a 60 then 86 the next hour, we extend sampling adaptively until the band tightens. Other tools don't even tell you.

The result: "73 ± 6 (ok)" — actionable. Theirs: "73" — coin flip.

Get Started Free

Run your first scan in 60 seconds.

1,000 credits on signup. All API engines. No credit card.